I love a vintage fragrance house. I mean a real vintage house, with dusty cobwebbed doors, crumbling damp walls, a bloom of mould, reeking of yesteryear, powdered ghosts roaming forgotten boudoirs and chapels reeking of fumy yesteryear. So many Houses either bury their past or fake and embellish the lineage, claiming false descendants, dubious provenance and elaborate reconstructions of past glories. Sometimes this is carried out with consummate brio, but there has to be full transparency and honesty about what it going on and the work being done with formulations and the olfactory genealogy otherwise the undertaking can seem pretentious and contrived.
I was
alerted to the existence of Oriza L. Legrand by a friend and fellow perfume
lover, Barry Wa. He has beautiful taste in scent and started a thread on
Basenotes (as Prince Barry) about Oriza after finding there was hardly any info
on the House out in the electronic ether. This thread grows week by week and
really has raised the profile of this exquisite house. So I really have to
thank Barry for sharing his love of Oriza with me.
There has
been a resurgence in recent years of old fragrances house opening up their
creaking vaults and re-launching their vintage style perfumes, soaps, creams
and powders. Many old houses have died and taken their olfactory secrets to
their powdered graves. Fashion and eras are fickle, taste is a brutal arbiter. In
many ways this is how it should be, time moves on. A few truly inspirational
and timeless behemoths survive through sheer force of adaptive will,
modernisation, money, timing and sometimes luck. Chanel, Dior, Lauder,
Guerlain, Caron (perhaps to a lesser degree) have seen off time and countless
competitors to be with us today, still creating perfume that stands the test of
time. Of course their work is different from originals, nothing is ever quite the
same. But arguably the spirit remains.
Over
time, smaller more unique Houses all over Europe have decayed into oblivion
after years of fashionability, influence and popularity. Some of them, Floris,
Creed, Penhaligon’s, Santa Maria Novella have survived into the modern era
though, cautiously and not without problems and an erosion of credibilty.
Elisabeth
de Feydeau, the French writer, lecturer and fragrance historian is credited by
many for the resurgence in fascination with older lost houses, particularly
French perfumeries. Elisabeth is an outstanding and illuminating writer, full
of wit and charm, her knowledge of perfumery is both extensive and esoteric. Her
book A Scented Palace: The Secret History
of Marie Antoinette's Perfumer, published in France in 2005 - elsewhere in
2006 - was a wonderful portrait of the life of Jean-Louis Fargeon, fiercely
loyal perfumer to Marie-Antoinette. The work oozes with astute period detail
but most importantly places the production of perfume firmly at the centre of
the story. To coincide with the publication of the book, perfumer Francis
Kurkdjian created a scent called Sillage
de la Reine, inspired as closely as possible by Fargeon’s consultations
with the Queen, trying to capture the scent of Trianon for her. Again working with
and inspired by Elisabeth’s passion and research, Sillage de la Reine was assembled with notes of rose, iris, cut
jasmine, tuberose and orange blossom enhanced with delicate touches of cedar
and sandalwood. Tonkin musk and precious ambergris round off a deep and rich
formulation. The project was a popular and critical success.
Elisabeth
de Feydeau’s research and obsession with this particular period has allowed us
to form a more detailed understanding of perfumery and the people whose
passions and talents drove the early days of this most ephemeral and sensual of
the arts. A good example is The House of Lubin, originally founded in 1798 and
resurrected in 2004 by Gilles Thevenin after many years of decline, with the
launch of the stunning Idole by
Olivia Giacobetti, a dense blend of sugar cane, rum, saffron, cumin, doum palm
and leather. By mixing new releases with re-orchestrations of vintage Lubin
formulas, the house has successfully revived itself. The English house
Atkinson’s re-launched itself recently, re-branding in the process but still
retaining its quintessentially stiff upper lip playfulness. Other existing
Houses such as Chanel, Dior, Guerlain, YSL plunder their archives and re-release
classics, tweaking here and there and in some cases just overhauling the
fragrances and creating an homage or
variant of the original.
It is
impossible to exactly recreate the original antique perfumes of yesteryear. And
even if you could, the chances are, you would fall very foul indeed of IFRA,
the body that regularly makes minute yet far-reaching pronouncements on what is
to be used in the elaborate construction of the perfumes we choose to wear. We
are all aware that exact replication is well nigh on impossible, but perfumery
in the spirit of a certain time and place, using atmospheric and timely raw
materials can still potentially yield heart-stopping and moving results.
Oriza L
Legrand has quite the scented history, going back to its foundation in 1720
under the regency of The Sun King Louis XV. Oriza was set up in the Cour Carrée
of the Louvre by Fargeon the Elder, a cousin to Jean-Louis Fargeon,
Marie-Antoinette’s famous perfumer. The name Oriza is a corruption of oryza sativa, latin for rice, a
reference to the vast amounts of rice powder used in face and wig preparations
of the day. Legend of the day has Fargeon learning his cosmetic and perfumed
secrets from Ninon de Lenclos, a celebrated and seemingly ageless courtesan.
This glittering association worked wonders for Oriza, making his name and
products a byword for in-the-know luxury and glamour at court.
The house
had a royal warrant and supplied numerous royal and imperial courts of the day.
Louis Legrand took the reins in 1811 and moved the location of the perfumery to
the Rue St Honoré where the Mulberry store is today. This was the major turning
point in the history of he House. Antonin Reynaud later joined Oriza as an
associate and Legrand eventually sold him the business. As a mark of respect
Reynaud named his new perfumery Oriza L. Legrand and the House developed from a
small-scale cottage enterprise into a fully fledged viable retail business with
full industrial and manufacturing processes behind it creating everything from
rice powder to perfume bottles.
The House
moved again in the 1800s to 11 Place de la Madeleine, where Baccarat is now.
Oriza L. Legrand was one of the first Houses to really exploit the concept of
perfumed body lines, with each scent available in powders and creams as well as
the House’s celebrated and patented solid perfume, Essence Oriza Solidifiée. Eventually by the 1930s Oriza was gone,
run into the ground by economic exhaustion and bad management. The wars were
not kind to perfumery. Many great houses suffered, smelling good was not a
necessity of war. Such frivolities were considered almost blasphemous and yet ironically,
bottles of perfume were items so sought after by soldiers returning home to
sweethearts and mothers.
Oriza L
Legrand was resuscitated by Franck Belaiche, a television and movie producer
with a passion for fine fragrance and history of scent. He did extensive
homework on Oriza and decided to take quite an olfactory gamble. Working with
over eighty fragrance recipes, an extensive archive, some existing old bottle
and lots of memories Franck set about re-orchestrating and reviving the scented
fortunes of Oriza L Legrand. After three years of intensive work with
perfumers, he decided to start the renaissance ball rolling with four
fragrances created between 1900 and 1920: Déjà
le Printemps, Rêve d’Ossian, Rélique d’Amour and Oeillet Louis XV. Since
then, Les Jardins D’Armides (1909), Horizon (1925) and Chypré Mousse (1914) have been added to the collection.
I have
been indulging in these fragrances repeatedly over the last couple of months,
immersing myself in Oriza’s hermetic and oddly claustrophobic world of time
gone by. As Franck and his colleague Hugo Lambert have both said on a number of
occasions these are not exact replicas of the original formulae, this is just
impossible. Times and tastes have changed so much and of course the larder of
raw materials is vastly depleted and restricted since the House began. The
best that can be achieved is capturing of the spirit and emotional heft of the
original perfumes. This is still incredibly difficult, demanding time, research,
dedication and a gut instinct that modern skins will appreciate such
atmospheric and ancient beauty. The trick is to provide people with a scented
window into the past. A highly romantisised window, rose-tined and sparkling.
It’s a little like historical fiction, you reconstruct the parts that will hook
the reader, dress the time to lure and seduce, avoid any real unpleasantness.
The stench, rotting teeth, pestilence, death and body odour. Perfume and
scented preparations were used to mask this reality.
We don’t
want that though, just the sanitised edition, smelling of roses. Historical
scented olfaction is difficult to balance; on the one hand there is a
responsibility to the source material, a certain amount of fragrant honesty. On
the other hand there is accuracy and what can be done with the best materials
available. Many Houses claim ancient or vintage continuance whereas in actual
fact the contemporary versions bear only a fleeting resemblance to their
forbears. We are better off looking to perfumers like Vero Kern, Andy Tauer,
Jovoy, Histoires de Parfums and Viktoria Minya for more imaginative echoes
of the past.
I think
on balance Oriza L. Legrand have got it right, the look of the brand, packaging
etc are delicately rendered with loving attention to detail. My bottle of Rélique D’Amour arrived wrapped in its
own matching paper with two long thin purse sprays and samples. The receipt
seemed delightfully out of time and the box is made from a tactile textured
card that adds layers of vintage precision to the experience of Oriza. The
bottles and labels are original designs, tweaked a little to look sharper and
more in tune with todays more aesthetic shopper. Vintage is huge business, and
vintage boudoir even more so. The fact that the juices are fantastic is an
added sweet smelling bonus.
I adore
powder, softness like this, craving it like my lost cigarettes and champagne.
It reminded me a little of Lann-Ael by
Lostmarc’h, my Breton bed scent, apples, vanilla and cereal notes stirred with honeyed
woods.
Les Jardins
D’Armides was delicious too, I got quite addicted to the wonderful almond
note wrapped up in musks, honey, tonka, carnation, violet and wisteria. It
sounds VERY floral, in keeping with its name, the legendary gardens of the Damascene
sorceress Armide who attempted to seduce the leader of the Crusaders by singing
him into a perfumed sleep in her enchanted gardens. Her plan did not succeed,
the city was sacked and Armide killed herself. The famous gardens became a kind
of shorthand or symbol for floral beauty and majesty and used in music, fashion
art throughout the ages, particularly during the Renaissance.
I was
struck how playful and giddy the perfume was. Now I love my florals, throw in
some powder and I’m a very happy Fox. But the execution must be good, there has
to be delicacy and form. The almond/macaroon note is just delicious, I imagined
running down pale blue corridors in a billowing white shirt, ragged bouquets of
roses, shedding their petals behind me.
Then on a
weirdly cold August morning as I felt fever in my bones I sprayed on Rélique D’Amour and rested.
Oriza
describe the fragrance as the smell of old Cistercian abbeys, mossy stones,
waxed wood, linseed, lamp smoke, the smells of veneration. I don’t disagree; many
of these elements are there woven through an intensely complex series of
sensory levels. There is divinity and calm, light and shadow, exalted beauty
and a strange awareness of approaching death in the fibres and fabric of
surrounding materials.
For me, Rélique D’Amour is a scent of mortality and intense searching
contemplation. I am not the biggest fan of incense. Over the years it has
become a very slapdash desultory note used as shorthand to the ecclesiastical,
the holy, the quick fix religious atmospheric backdrop. It is a cold note and
needs to warmed through with other more subtle and persuasive notes like
vanilla, benzoin, myrrh, tonka, tobacco and hay absolutes. It can be bitter and
harsh on the senses, pitiless. It needs discretion and a subtle artistic hand
to create anything truly unique. The only great incense scent for me was Etro’s
Messe de Minuit, dark and dolorous,
it seemed to enter one’s very soul and take root, pulling down the sun from the
sky.
Rélique D’Amour is a painting. Of a time and place, a mood
pervades the canvas and the colours and tones shift and blur, coalescing into
pictures within pictures, moods within moods. It is a scent of solitude and
silence. The shock of crumbling damp wood and snuffed out flames creates a hush
of tremendous beauty. Marrying the remnants of smoke with lichen-clan stones is
a remarkable idea. In the centre of this are sleeping lilies, the symbols of
purity, brought to Mary by the Angel Gabriel, oozing their indolic, funeral
odours over stained waxed woods. The myrrh note is augmented by musk and
pepper, reminding us that death is never far away. Used for embalming and
funeral rites, myrrh has tremendous power in this scent, grounding the
experience, filtering in the gaps between notes, sealing out the light. It’s
not to say this is a particularly heavy scent, the fresh herbs and pine at the
top set an oddly joyful initial impression like stumbling upon a massive hidden
verdigris door and pushing it open. The odours that billow out mingle with the
grass and trees behind you. Darkness beckons.
I am
quite stunned by the beauty of Rélique
D’Amour, I love the overgrown ruined feel of the notes on my skin, the
mildewed echo of prayer and loss it brings to mind. I smell cells and closure,
a shutting off of the mind. Sniffing again today I realised the lilies are a
glowing reminder of carnality, just enough to light a flame under jaded senses.
They will be forever my fetish flower, blooming on the border between swooning
desire and purity. This is a perfume for fallen angels and lost boys and girls.
I imagine a ruined emerald chapel buried deep in the woods, lost to time. A
solitary man visits each day and lays a single white lily on the floor. The
name he whispers is lost to the furred and glistening wall. He lights a candle
and sits for a while, silent, fingers touching the stones around him with a
lover’s caress. As night drops like a stone into a bleak well, he blows out the
candle and disappears softly into the darkness.
For more information on Oriza L. Legrand, please follow link below:
Beautiful!I still think I like Chypre Mousse more though!Its smell is like how I imagine that the body of a forest nymph smells like
ReplyDeletethank u… i love the wood nymph image..there is something strange and other worldly in all of these Oriza scents, a sense of time displaced, history fractured. They are a constant delight to wear.
DeleteBeautiful review! Oriza is a favorite of mine, especially as they are the creators of one of my all time favorite fragrances, Chypre Mousse, which I adore for its sensually rendered moss, mushrooms, and violets.
ReplyDeleteKiva..thank you for your kind words. im loving the Chypre Mousse more and more. I have never been a huge chypre fan, but the melancholy woodland construction of this is just incredible, so who knows, it may be joining 'Relique d'Amour' in my collection.
DeleteGood Lord - you sold me on this post. You have painted a beautiful picture and like you, am drawn to vintage and historic perfumes. I was intrigued by the posts by Kafkaesque, but you breathed some added life into this house for me. Am going to the site now! Steve
ReplyDeleteYours is the first review of Relique d'Amour to mention love at all, much less any mention of lost love. I found your evocation of candle-lighting for an irreplaceable lover to be absolutely spot-on, and because it resonated with my own losses, to be very moving.
ReplyDeleteWe tend to think of relics as matters we purposely keep because of their significance, but just as often we have no choice in the relics we carry, our only choice being in the significance we attach to them.
My own vision from Relique was very different, not cold or forlorn at all. It brought me to the sunny garden behind my childhood home where my mother grew lily of the valley, mint, kitchen herbs, and day lillies. The aura was of warmth, envelopment, discovery and contentment. The house, the garden and my mother are gone, but the discovery, the earth, the sun and the growth still remain. In a breath, Relique said why we stay here and, when we can, show these things to new people who see them for the first time.
How on earth did I not comment on this? Very moving, especially because this house is dear to my heart. Relique is one of my favourites.
ReplyDelete